On the afternoon of Saturday January 18, a man driving a semi-truck was arrested in Van Buren County for driving recklessly after several motorists called in to report his erratic driving behavior, according to a news article at Mlive.com. The man, whose name was not released, told police that he did not stop although he was exhausted because he had deadlines to meet. He admitted that his tiredness was affecting his driving.

15 separate 911 calls were received by Kalamazoo County Central Dispatch regarding the truck driver’s erratic driving according to the Van Buren County Sheriff’s Office. The man was driving in the area of the Galesburg Exit on I-94 in a westbound direction and upon reaching Van Buren County, prompted additional calls to the Central Dispatch Authority of Van Buren County. The driver of the semi-truck was pulled over by an officer at approximately 3 p.m. after the officer witnessed the man’s erratic driving; he was arrested for reckless driving.

The deputy viewed a four-minute long video which was captured by the passenger of a vehicle the semi-truck nearly struck according to police; the video revealed even more erratic driving behavior. The driver of the semi-truck was taken to jail, and his truck removed from the roadway.

Reckless driving is a misdemeanor criminal offense in the state of Michigan. The penalties for a conviction are harsh, and may include a fine of up to $500, up to 93 days in jail, points assigned to your driving record, and a 90 day hard suspension of your driver’s license, followed by a period of restricted driving.

Michigan drivers license reinstatement attorneys understand the hardship losing your driving privilege creates. In today’s society, it is virtually impossible to live normally when you cannot drive, and extremely inconvenient. However, there are situations in which a charge of reckless driving may be reduced to a civil infraction, thereby reducing penalties. It is important that those charged with reckless driving do not go to court and plead guilty without first consulting a lawyer.

Continue reading

In October of 2012, 29-year-old Kurt Allen Smith was arrested after repeatedly trying to run a female Kalamazoo public safety officer off the road, according to news articles at Mlive.com. Following the incident officers found what they believed to be heroin along with components for manufacturing meth. Police also suspected Smith was under the influence of drugs. Now, police have released a dash cam video which captured the incident.

It all began when Public Safety Officer Laurel Palk was patrolling in the area of S. Park Street in Kalamazoo. As she traveled northbound, another vehicle began tailgating her patrol car. Palk claimed that she could not see the vehicle’s headlights in her rearview mirror. As the incident continued, Smith’s vehicle accelerated rapidly after swerving to the left, then swerving right. Palk said she had to brake hard to avoid a collision. The suspect made several attempts to run Palk off the road when other officers arrived to help.

The dash cam video captured Smith attempting to strike Palk’s car and run her off the road. After a few minutes, Palk parks her vehicle and waits for additional officers to arrive. When they do, Smith resists arrest; officers have to pull him from his vehicle and hold him to the ground.

At the time of the incident, authorities were seeking charges against Smith which included possession of heroin, possession of meth-making components, operating while under the influence of drugs, resisting and obstructing an officer, and felonious assault with a motor vehicle.

In Michigan, heroin is a Schedule 1 illegal drug which means it is one of the most addictive and dangerous, leaving those convicted of possession facing severe criminal penalties. In fact, possession of less than 50 grams of heroin may result in fines of up to $25,000 and up to four years in jail. Considering all of the criminal charges against the defendant in this case, it is likely he will face serious consequences if convicted; he is scheduled to go on trial January 28.

Continue reading

On Thursday January 16, 41-year-old Jacob Morales Perez was found guilty of strangling Angela Vance, his live-in girlfriend, in August of 2012. Perez was convicted of second-degree murder for the strangulation death.

According to news reports at Mlive.com, the two were fighting at their Flint home on Minnesota Avenue when Vance knocked of Perez’s glasses while slapping him in the face. A Genesee County Prosecutor’s office news release claims that after being slapped, Perez lunged at his girlfriend and proceeded to strangle her to death.

Perez allegedly went outside of the home following the incident, where he called his brother after drinking a couple of beers. Perez’s sister and boyfriend went to the home after she was given the news by the brother; she called 911 after finding Vance dead in the home.

Perez fully cooperated with police according to his defense lawyer, and told them all that had happened, saying that the day had started out good, and ultimately ended in five minutes of hell. Perez simply became enraged when Vance slapped him. Perez’s defense attorney attempted to argue that his client should be charged with manslaughter, a lesser offense, because he was in a state of anger triggered by the emotional excitement of being slapped when he strangled the victim.

Genesee County Prosecutor David Leyton even agreed that it was a tragic case, but said for Angela to receive justice, Perez had to be held accountable for his lethal actions.

Perez is scheduled to be sentenced on February 18, and faces up to life in prison.

In Michigan, second-degree murder encompasses homicide offenses which are not premeditated or committed in the perpetration of a crime such as robbery, home invasion, kidnapping, arson, or carjacking. How many years Perez will spend behind bars is ultimately up to the jurors who may choose to have him imprisoned for life, or any number of years.

Continue reading

43-year-old Ynes Danyelle Lee of Grand Rapids is charged with open murder in the killing of her husband, Bertram Nathaniel Lee, in August of last year. On Wednesday, Lee rejected an offer by prosecutors to plead guilty to manslaughter or second-degree murder, according to news reports at Mlive.com. If convicted, Lee will potentially face life in prison.

On August 17, Lee allegedly stabbed her 52-year-old husband with a steak knife at the couples’ apartment. He died just over a week later at Mercy Saint Mary’s Health Care from his injuries.

The couple had been married for 13 years; during that time, Bertram Lee had been convicted of domestic violence on at least three occasions. The defendant filed for divorce in 2011, but it was never finalized. Bertram Lee pleaded guilty to attempted domestic violence in April of 2011 and was placed on probation for two years. Lee swore out a personal protection order in May of 2011 against her husband, saying that he had been violent with her on and off over a 12-year period.

Had Lee accepted the prosecutor’s plea agreement and pleaded guilty to manslaughter as a two-time felony offender, she would have faced six to 22 1/2 years in prison. A guilty plea to second-degree murder would have left her facing any number of years to life in prison.

Michigan criminal defense attorneys understand that in some cases a defendant feels justified in his or her actions, and chooses not to plead guilty to a crime that individual feels he or she is innocent of. Perhaps Lee was acting in self defense, in fear of her own life. A guilty plea would have left her under a cloud of suspicion for the remainder of her life.

Choosing to go to trial on charges of open murder is tough; hopefully if Lee was acting in self-defense and protecting her own life, she will have an effective criminal defense lawyer in her corner who will win at trial.

Continue reading

26-year-old Chad Neiderquill requested to withdraw his guilty plea to armed robbery in connection with a September 2013 incident in which he allegedly robbed a Saginaw woman of prescription medication using a screwdriver. On December 23, Saginaw County Circuit Judge James T. Borchard approved the defendant’s request. Borchard agreed on the condition that Neiderquill apply for inclusion in Saginaw County’s Drug Court, according to news reports at Mlive.com.

Neiderquill was scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Borchard on January 9, however that was adjourned when the defendant withdrew his plea.

On September 4, Lillian George was putting groceries away when Neiderquill, whom 60-year-old George knew, offered to help her carry in the groceries. When all of the packages had been carried inside, Neiderquill demanded George give him her prescription medicines, including oxycodone. When she would not comply with his demands, he allegedly pulled out a screwdriver and held it over George’s head.

Neiderquill may be able to avoid prison time if accepted into Drug Court. Drug Courts require that the individual enter into a multi-year rehabilitation program in which those accepted receive services from multiple county agencies and intense supervision. He may also remain jailed for the duration of the program.

The maximum penalty in Michigan for armed robbery is life in prison. If accepted into Drug Court, Neiderquill may be able to avoid spending a substantial number of years or even life behind bars. Drug Courts are designed to help those who participate in criminal activity which results from an addiction to drugs, and focus on both punishment and rehabilitation.

Continue reading

In January of 2012, Benjamin French was sentenced to life in prison for allegedly killing an MSU student and his roommate in the course of an armed robbery involving drugs. The double murder occurred on March 25 of 2010; the victims were Owen Goodenow and Darren Brown Jr.

French, who is now 25 years old, appealed his conviction. Recently, a three-judge panel upheld the convictions for armed robbery and murder, according to a news article at The Lansing State Journal. Another man, David Marion Jr., is serving 40 to 60 years after pleading guilty to two counts of second-degree murder in the case.

Testimony in court indicated that Brown and Goodenow sold marijuana. According to detectives, French and Marion planned to set up a drug buy from Goodenow. They would get him to open his safe, then shoot him. Brown, who was 18 years old, came home unexpectedly early after attending class at MSU. Both of the victims were shot in the head.

In appealing his conviction, French argued that police did not have a warrant when they listened in on a telephone conversation between himself and Marion, and that this was illegal. He also argued that the calls should not have been allowed at trial, because they originated in Illinois, a state where all parties involved must agree before phone conversations may be recorded.

Marion had signed an FBI consent form prior to the phone calls with French, and agreed to investigators recording the calls. The appeals court found that when one party consents to the monitoring and recording of telephone conversations, a warrant is not needed. His request to have his conviction overturned was denied.
Appealing a criminal conviction or sentence is a process which requires the skill and ability of an experienced Michigan criminal appeals attorney. It is not often the appeals court overturns a conviction or sends a case back to court for resentencing. To have the best possible chance of success, the quality of lawyer you choose is paramount.

Continue reading

Two South Haven individuals were recently arrested on multiple charges including carrying an unregistered handgun and possession of marijuana, according to news reports at Mlive.com. The couple, a 38-year-old man and 36-year-old woman, were walking in Geneva Township when they were stopped by Van Buren County sheriff’s deputies.

Deputies reportedly were responding to reports of a domestic dispute between the two, who were found walking in the roadway at about 2:30 on Saturday afternoon in the 66000 block of 8th Avenue. When deputies questioned the couple, both denied that a domestic assault had occurred. Deputies also said they did not find any physical evidence that an assault had taken place, however the woman did have marijuana in her possession. The man was in possession of a .22 caliber handgun which was tucked inside his waistband in a holster.

Investigators stated that the man admitted to firing a shot at his home before leaving, but said that he was taking the handgun to show to a friend. Further investigation revealed the man has an extensive criminal history and is a known felon.

Both individuals’ names were being withheld pending their arraignments. The man was charged with carrying a concealed weapon violation, possession of an unregistered handgun, and felon in possession of a firearm. The woman was charged with marijuana possession, according to police.

Marijuana possession is a serious drug offense in Michigan. In most cases, a first-time offender will face misdemeanor charges, and if convicted be subject to a maximum of one year in jail and fines of up to $2,000. However, there are many factors which may impact the criminal penalties an individual faces when charged with marijuana possession. For example, if it is determined that you are growing marijuana or are in possession of plants, you may face felony charges which will result in harsher penalties. Criminal penalties may also be enhanced if an individual is found to be in possession of marijuana in close proximity to a park, school, or church. Michigan Penal Code 333.7401 dictates that those convicted of cultivating marijuana will face fines of as much as $20,000 along with up to four years in prison.

Continue reading

Last week, trial was scheduled to begin for 21-year-old James Paul Simpkins II of Detroit who is accused of killing his brother and two others. Simpkins allegedly killed the three victims at a Flint home in 2012 during a house party, according to news articles at Mlive.com.

The party was taking place on July 18 of 2012 when police were dispatched to the residence after an altercation broke out in which one of the alleged victims called Simpkins “crazy.” Prosecutors claim Simpkins opened fire inside the home where party goers were drinking and smoking marijuana. The defendant called 911 himself, claiming that his brother had been shot and that someone assaulted him. Authorities claim that the defendant did the shooting himself. One woman who survived being shot fled through a window at the home and contacted police. She was able to lead them to the suspect.

Genesee County Prosecutor David Leyton claims that Simpkins opened fire on the party after another person present began taunting and harassing him, calling him “crazy” or something similar.

Simpkins is charged with assault with intent to commit sexual penetration, assault with intent to murder, felony firearm, and three counts of murder. If convicted, he could spend the rest of his life in prison.

Michigan criminal defense attorneys know that in situations where many people are “partying” or consuming alcohol and drugs, the risk of violence often increases. While it is certainly a tragedy that three people lost their lives, it is also tragic that a young man may spend the remainder of his life behind bars.

Continue reading

On Sunday January 12, an incident that police are calling “road rage” led to the firing of a gun from a man riding a motorcycle into an SUV, according to news reports at Mlive.com. Now, 22-year-old Steven Lavigne is facing charges of attempted murder and more after the bullet nearly struck a child riding in the SUV.

Lavigne allegedly began chasing the Chevrolet Trailblazer following a traffic altercation. Inside the SUV were a man and his two children, ages 7 and 10. Lavigne followed the SUV on his motorcycle for nearly two miles, then pulled up next to it and fired into the rear section, nearly striking one of the children. Lavigne has a concealed pistol license according to Westland Police Lt. Todd Adams. He then fled the scene, but called police at the same time the SUV driver flagged down a police officer.

The defendant is now charged with three counts each of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder, assault with intent to murder, assault with a dangerous weapon, and single counts of felonious use of a firearm and discharging a weapon from a vehicle.

Assault with intent to commit murder and assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder are both extremely serious charges. Those convicted of assault with intent to commit murder face criminal penalties including a maximum of life in prison according to the Michigan Penal Code 750.83. In many cases when evidence against a defendant is overwhelming, he or she may be given an opportunity by prosecutors to plead guilty or no contest to the charges, thereby reducing charges and penalties.

Continue reading

Last month we wrote about Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a Nigerian man sentenced to life for attempting to blow up a Northwest Airlines flight headed to Detroit from Amsterdam on Christmas day in 2009. Abdulmutallab had explosives concealed in his underwear, and attempted to ignite the explosives as the plane was approaching the Detroit Metropolitan Airport. While the explosive caught fire, it failed to detonate. Abdulmutallab was the only passenger out of the 289 on board who was injured.

Abdulmutallab was charged with several criminal offenses including conspiracy to commit an act of terrorism and attempted murder. He chose to represent himself at trial, and pleaded guilty to all eight counts one day later. He was sentenced to four consecutive life sentences plus 30 years and 240 months.

The defendant appealed his conviction, arguing whether his sentences were constitutional, the admission of statements he made while in the hospital being treated for his injuries, and the court’s decision to allow him to represent himself.

Ultimately the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld Abdulmutallab’s conviction, ruling that when he pleaded guilty to the charges, he waived any right to challenge the suppression of statements he gave while in the hospital. The appeals panel also rejected his arguments that he should not have been allowed to proceed without a defense lawyer without a competency hearing being ordered. It was determined by the appeals court that Abdulmutallab’s sentence was not ‘cruel and unusual’ punishment, as had the bomb detonated the defendant would not have been the only one harmed.

Michigan criminal appeals attorneys understand how difficult the appeals process is, and the low odds of winning. Regardless of whether an individual is appealing a conviction for armed robbery, DUI, carjacking, murder, or any criminal offense, it is critical the defendant is represented by a capable and aggressive lawyer who is highly familiar with the appeals process.

Continue reading

Contact Information