Alleged Corruption At Detroit Police Department

An ongoing investigation into the Detroit police department narcotics unit has turned up some serious problems within the unit. The investigation has looked into allegations of corruption and continues to investigate. The investigation has uncovered possible false affidavits that led to convictions. Because of these false affidavits, these convictions might be getting overturned and for some people, will mean their freedom. Investigators have also uncovered more alleged corruption in the forms of planting evidence, robbing drug dealers, and embezzling money. There have also been numerous instances where suspects were turned into confidential police informants without the proper approval. The team of investigators is comprised of Detroit police officers, Michigan state police troopers, and FBI agents. This 17-person investigation team is looking within a 10-year period of narcotics unit activity. It is estimated the investigation will be looking into as many as 10,000 police drug raids. This specific drug unit was disbanded in 2014 because of rampant internal problems in how evidence and drugs were handled.

The Current Investigation

News has recently broken that former University of Michigan doctor Robert Anderson has been accused of sexually abusing three men during his time at the university. The accusers have claimed that the university has allowed this type of abuse to go on for decades. Those making the allegations were athletes of the university when Dr. Anderson was employed at the University of Michigan. With these allegations coming to the surface, there has been an outcry for Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel to investigate the matter.

In response to these allegations, Nessel said that her office would investigate those allegations with two primary conditions:

First, the state Legislature must appropriate money for the investigation, similar to what it did for the sex scandal investigation at Michigan State University. And second, U-M must cooperate, be completely transparent and waive all attorney-client privileges, which was not done in MSU’s abuse scandal.

The debate is back on in the Michigan Legislature over whether to pass a law preventing local governments from banning breed-specific dogs. The main breed which has always been at issue is the pit bull. The way most people view the debate on breed-specific bans usually coincides with how they view pit bulls. Usually if you like pit bulls or are a pit bull owner, you are against local governments being able to ban them. If you are afraid of what pit bulls are capable of, then you are for local governments being able to ban them. New legislation has been proposed to prevent any Michigan community from banning dogs based on their breed.

House Bill 4035 Explained

This proposed legislation has been sponsored by Rep. Jim Ellison (D) out of Royal Oak. It is titled House Bill 4035 and it seeks to keep local governments from enacting any law banning the ownership of a dog based on its breed. This bill would also prevent any policy that deems any specific breed of dog as a dangerous animal. The bill does not prevent communities from passing and enforcing restrictions or requirements on dogs and/or their owners. Communities would still be allowed to regulate dogs that are determined to be dangerous based on factors other than breed.

Michigan is known as a state that looks to statistics. Statistics or (stats) tell a story that often speaks louder than words. One stat is has led to a criminal justice task force is that the number of prisoners in county jails has tripled in the last 35 years, and despite this, crime has steadily dropped over the previous 50 years. To examine these issues, we spoke to top criminal lawyers in the state of Michigan.

Scott Grabel is the founder of Grabel and Associates, which is known as the top criminal defense team throughout the state of Michigan. Grabel provided commentary when he stated, “Governor Whitmer made this issue a top priority when she was running for office. The increase of incarcerated individuals with a decrease in crime makes no sense. We do see a lot of judges that are deciding to jail people for misdemeanors. While judges have the right to do so, the reality is that this hurts not only the incarcerated individual but the taxpayers of Michigan. We need reform, and we need it now.”

William Amadeo is a partner at McManus and Amadeo in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and a Senior Associate for Grabel and Associates in Wayne County, Michigan. Amadeo is known as the top criminal defense lawyer in Washtenaw County and has built a strong reputation across the state of Michigan. When asked about the reform, Amadeo stated, “I know that Michigan Supreme Court Justice Bridget McCormack has been involved in this reform and she has always been a very forward thinker. I do feel a big problem that those of us on the defense side of the issue is the reluctance of counsel to push matters to trial. We should always start to work as a team with the prosecutor and probation, but if that respect is not returned, we need to be capable and willing to go to war for our clients. If you want to put my client in jail for a misdemeanor, we should go to trial. It ridiculous to clog up the jails for matters such as those charges, and that is why our jails are so crowded.”

Original Case Details

Back in November of 2018, a man named Thomas Moorman was pulled over for speeding In Alger County in the Upper Peninsula. He was pulled over by State police at a gas station. The state trooper claimed he smelled a strong odor of fresh marijuana coming from the vehicle. He believed that there was a “good quantity” of marijuana in the vehicle due to how strong the smell was. Moorman was asked if he had any marijuana in the vehicle and he said no. The trooper continued to ask about the marijuana smell and Moorman finally admitted that he had harvested some earlier in the day and further told the trooper that he is a medical marijuana caregiver and has five patients assigned under him. The trooper then searched his truck and found he was within the regulated limits of being a caregiver. The trooper then asked him if he had any weapons and Moorman slapped a handgun onto the dash of his truck. He had a license for the pistol from the state of Indiana. Moorman, however, was in violation of his pistol license because he was required to transfer his license to Michigan once he lived here for a year, which at that point he had. The trooper also found prescription pills that Moorman did not have a prescription for. Moorman was charged with illegally carrying a concealed weapon along with possession charges for the prescription pills. Moorman challenged the search stating that the smell of marijuana alone would not allow a search in these circumstances.

The Court Of Appeals Decision

Original Case Details

A man charged with the murder and mutilation of a 25-year old man in Shiawasee County has been found incompetent to stand trial. The victim was found in a secret room in the defendant’s basement just after Christmas day of 2019. Investigators found the victim was stabbed in the back and hung from his ankles. The victim’s throat was also slashed, and parts of his body were allegedly eaten by the defendant. Police records show that 2 other men had previously been held captive in the same basement of the defendant but managed to get away. Neither of these previous men wanted to file charges due to being scared and wanting the incident to remain private. The defendant has since been evaluated by the state’s Center for Forensic Psychiatry and been declared incompetent to stand trial. This is an extremely rare outcome as insanity defenses are rarely used and only a small percentage of insanity defenses result in the defendant being declared incompetent to stand trial.

What Is Competency?

The Michigan State Police recently contracted a software firm to create and expand a huge database of citizen information that is intended to be used as a crime-fighting instrument. The contract’s overall cost was over $12 million. This contract was awarded back in December 2018 to a software company called “Information Builders.” The state of Michigan has now halted all work related to the database project saying that their product is inoperable. The company has recently sent a $2.6 million invoice for work performed which is being disputed by the state of Michigan.

“Golden Records” And The Surrounding Controversy

Information Builders promised the Michigan State Police that they would create a huge collection of data that would produce what is termed “golden records” on its citizens. These records are considered “golden” because of the way that they would combine different data from all kinds of sources, including social media. Civil liberties attorneys have found this to be controversial because of the potential for abuse and the potential of unconstitutional surveillance of citizens. They also argue that these records will simply concentrate more police efforts in areas that are already over-policed.

Original Case Details

Ramon Ward was convicted of the murder of two women in 1994. He was 18 years old back on January 21st when he was charged in the deaths of two women at a vacant drug house in Detroit. There were no physical evidence or eyewitnesses linking Ward to the murders. His conviction was based on a pair of jailhouse snitches an unsigned “confession” that a Detroit cop tried to push as true. Prosecutors believed that Ward had enticed the women to the Detroit drug house in order to steal a disability check from one of the women and then shot the women, killing them. Two men who shared a cell with Ward at Detroit Police Headquarters came forward claiming that Ward had confessed to them that he committed the murders. One of the snitches received a reduced murder sentence from 12-25 years to time served. The other jailhouse snitch was facing up to 15 years for a breaking and entering while being a habitual offender. His sentence ended up being one-year probation for his cooperation with police. Ward was convicted and served 26 years in prison for murders he did not commit until he was exonerated.

Why Was He Exonerated?

The 2020 election season will present many changes to Washtenaw County. With Ann Arbor and its surrounding cities playing a vital role in our criminal justice system, the 2020 Judicial Elections will be one of the most important in recent years.

The main reason for these contested elections is the retirement of 14-B District Court Judge Charles Pope and Washtenaw County Circuit Court Judge David Swartz. These openings, coupled with a hotly contested prosecutorial election between Arianne Slay, Eli Savit, and Hugo Mack is making these elections pivotal to our criminal justice system. To gain insight into these elections and how they may shape the future of Washtenaw County, we spoke to several of the top criminal lawyers in the state of Michigan.

Scott Grabel is the founder of Grabel and Associates, which is a firm known as the top criminal defense team in our state. When asked about the elections, Grabel said, “Judge David Swartz is someone that has always been an excellent voice in the Washtenaw Circuit Court. There are a lot of candidates running, and I can only hope that whoever takes his spot on the bench does so with the same fairness that Judge Swartz has always provided. We do a substantial amount of work in Washtenaw County, and it has always been a good place to practice. To keep that tradition in place will be in the best interest of justice.”

Have you ever wondered, “is there a law for EVERYTHING in the state of Michigan?” Well if you truly knew how many laws there were, then you would most likely as that question. In actuality, there is a law for almost everything in the state of Michigan. According to a 2014 study that studied a problem known as “overcriminalization,” the state of Michigan was found to have more than 918 section in its criminal code. As a comparison, the state of Illinois which has nearly 3 million more residents than Michigan, has approximately 333 less sections within its criminal code than Michigan does. Legal experts have stated that Michigan’s penal code is too big and too complex and needs to be reformed. There are over 3,100 criminal laws in the state of Michigan. This number is eight times larger than the Model Penal Code which was published in an effort to try to update and standardize many laws across the country.

Recent Updates In The Law

The state of Michigan has recognized that there is a problem with too many laws that are either outdated, not enforced, or just plain silly. There has been a significant effort towards reigning in the problem of overcriminalization in the state of Michigan. From 2008-2013 the state legislature created approximately 45 new laws every year. 44% of these new laws were felonies. 2014-2017 saw a change where only approximately seven new criminal laws were created each year. The entire time period only saw an increase of 26 new criminal laws. 53% of these new criminal laws were felonies.

Contact Information